challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep

who shoots first and gets the hit. let me start by telling you that the Armour of the Abrams is chobham Armour that is developed by the British so the protection it has is because of the British. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous. rest of army is t80 t 90, both poor to infantry as they lost over 200 in chetchen? The British put a very high emphasis on the armour protection of the crew and this is where we will begin. Rheinmatall the manufacturer have also developed an upgrade that allows the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles. It is highly recommended against by the tanks manual.) It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. I was also a turret rat for 4 years, so I've worked on them. Having out patient surgery in Springfield, il. The Russian T-90 is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore gun which, similar to the others, fires APFSDS rounds and like the Abrams and Leopard 2 uses HEAT. Mobility. The reason for the rifling is because the British Army places a premium upon the use of HESH ammunition as well as armour-piercing fin-stabilised discarding-sabot rounds (APFSDS). Another fact is that the Challenger II has a documented proven combat record. It must be a nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard etc. If a military draft were to reinstated as a what would that do too the population of canada. offensive. Lv 6. The MBT is as relevant now as its always been, hence the urgency to build new ones to counter Russia’s latest creation. The hesh rounds have a much longer range (up to 5 miles further) than APFSDS and are much more effective against buildings as well as thinner skinned vehicles. M1A2 SEP Abrams 3. Along with many other data points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95% hit ratio. Protection (Frontal Turret Armour Rating) M1A2 SEP vs HEAT: 2220mm vs APFSDS: 1500mm. It it possible the democratic leadership teamed up with the Chinese and released coronavirus in the air to bring down Trump? Thank you for facts. 1994-ben 800 millió font értékben további 259 darab harckocsit és 9 darab gyakorló járművet rendeltek, melyeket 1998-ban állítottak szolgálatba, ezzel leváltva a Challenger … Hi, After watching the performance of the M1A2 vs the Challenger II in the recent war in the Gulf, I was led to believe that the M1A2 seemed far superior. It also notes that the new T-14 Armata may be a contender as well. For this comparison we will mainly focus on what the Challenger 2 is equipped with and will compare the equipment to the US M1A2 Abrams, the German Leopard 2A6 and the Russian T-90. Though I don’t in anyway condemn the then government’s priorities, conventional land weapons such as the CH2 and AS90’s had little if any upgrade apart from a few demonstration vehicles. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev. Thats a very good point. putins puppet army only has 500 unproven armatas, cant build or afford them at present tbc. Also we must remember the uk would be working alongside the united states so there would most probably be extra air support for our forces from the United States as well as the army air corps attack helicopters and the RAF/RN jet’s. The second was the Persian Gulf War era Challenger 1, which was the British army's main battle tank (MBT) from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s. Challenger 2. was back in action a few days later?only 1 challenger loss, hit by another challenger tank. Cullen's Hound. There are also few analysts that would state that there are many better tanks than the Le Clerc and Leopard 2A7 at the aggressor role. All this gives it a maximum speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road. Are you able to guess the thgird ‘main part’ of a tank yet? Answer Save. While many aspects were changed the sensor module remains the same TICM II with an analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz. The Challenger 2 can shrug off a 105mm no problem with the chobham armor. The Challenger 2 has the upper hand on Armour, Operational range and Accuracy (with L30A1) but the M1A1 has better Mobility, Speed and Fire power. As with defence trends, the main battle tank is once again back in focus. The L30 is 120mm in diameter and 55-calibers long, made from high tech steel with a chromium alloy lining. This is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank that is rifled. Differing again is the Leopard 2A6 which has core spaced armour and composite armour rumoured to be based off Chobham armour. dsm37127. Challenger 2? However, the current M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger 2. There was little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so were relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers. I still believe the MBT is a vital element as witnessed in Iraq. The article picks the five best MBTs in descending order as Leopard 2A7, K2 Black Panther, M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2 and Merkava Mk4. Vickers Defence Systems (later Alvis Vickers, now BAE Systems Land Systems) began to develop a successor to Challenger 1 as a private venture in 1986. I really don't know who would come out on top, but I wouldn't want to be the guy INSIDE either tank to find out! Following the issue of a Staff Requirement for … Relevance. Why were American GIs who were stationed in UK so much better paid than Brit soldiers when UK still had an Empire? In comparison the T-90 has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour and explosive reactive armour. Collapse. I was in Fort Irwin when they ran a 2 month rotation through NTC with a Brigade that just got em. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. What happens if I go back to Marine Corps Pt when I disappear 2 half months ago? M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc vs. Leopard 2, K2 Black Panther, T-90, Oplot, Type 99 on firepower,armour. To the point were the manufacturers are calling it the Euro Leopard. what it all boils down to is the tank crewmen. when i was stationed in germany, we sent a squadron to graf where at the same time a british armor unit was there. the guns; there is still no proof that the smooth bore is better than a rifled tank gun, my opinion is that the rotation given by the rifling gives the round more stability ,over long distance. The M1A2 Abrams being another solid choice. The two main parts of a MBT are the Gun and the Armour. Challenger 2 specified an updated TOGS system called TOGS II. dont forget the TUSK ERA scales that can be fitted on a M1A in addtion to the DU enforced 1st generation chobham the challenger got the longest range t2t kill at 5.1 km the M1A1 has engaged upto 4km. The Merkava has quite some different design, while the tanks of other nations are considerably lighter if memory serves me right. The Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension but has a much more powerful engine at just over 1450 hp. You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer. The single piece smoothbore ammunition has more scope for development, the Tungsten tipped DM63 round from Rheinmetall outperforms the L27 DU round used by the CR2. i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq. A pályázaton a Challenger 2 mellett az M1A2 Abrams, valamint a Leopard 2 is indult, ám végül a brit konstrukció győzött. ... Dare to Compare --- M1A2 Abrams SEP versus Challenger 2! With the latest M1A2 SEP/TUSK I think the Abrams has taken a definitive lead. if the U.S. has the strongest military could we win any war? Tank Killer helicopters are a real and effective threat, but can’t totally eliminate the need for MBT’s. That would be a good fight! the challenger has very thick armor but it doesn't have slanted armor on the turret like the abrams, has a far better protection and don't forget the crew of a challenger they can always offer you a nice hot cup of Thea thanks to the build in water cooker much appreciated on a cold morning. Filter. The FV4034 Challenger 2, is the UKs Main Battle Tank and operates across the globe from exercises with allied countries to theatres of war like Iraq. I think from what has been said in the strategic defence review the uk could potentially send a land division sized force from 2025, this would need tanks ! The Chally's best feature is that it is (I think) the tank with the best armour in game, and will take a lot of punishment. More details here: https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Furthermore Abrams is also fitted with hunter killer optics. It should be noted that the article and video in Focus are really not very informative. It is equipped with second generation Chobham armour (this generation known as Dorchester) which is said to be around two times stronger than steel. 8 Answers. What a load of badly written tosh! Husband cannot come into medical center due to COVID policy. Page of 10. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. Abrams M1A2 SEP vs. Published on Sep 13, 2014. There presents as a visual deterrent still works especially, when deployed within cities to dissuade unruly elements. Challenger 2 is a third generation MBT, the same generation as the Russian T-80 & T-90, German Leopard 2 and US M1 Abrams. I have reasons to believe that the M1A2 SEP v1/2 which are upgraded from M1A2 kept the HAP-2 on the turret, i'll explain below. Challenger 2 is also fitted with Thermal observation and Gunnery Sight (TOGS II) which  provides nightvision and thermal imaging which is displayed on the commanders and gunners monitors, combined all this is called hunter killer optics. In comparison the M1A2 Abrams is equipped with a 120mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be carried. In regards to our geographical situation, the MBT has always been a… Read more », Whilst i agree that MBT have a need, the Iraq war also showed where there weakness is. Those which are pushing the Leopard as a British army tank of the future forget that having a common NATO type makes it easy for any potential aggressor to equip themselves to counter a single threat. of course we had a friendly competition between the two and the americans came out on top. Challenger 2 is very good. Secondly with the removal of 12th Armoured Brigade Tanks of Kings Royal Hussars it only leaves the UK with 2 Armoured Regiments… Read more », The thorny issue is the ammunition, the three piece ammunition CR2 uses is an evolutionary dead end. The T-90 can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. Challenger 2: Compared to the Competition. No? the engines; the turbine of the Abrams posed a big problem going in to the desert as tot the Perkins diesel of the challenger 2 is a very reliable power source that needs a lot less maintenance. Other world powers across the globe also use MBTs in their armies. Additionally MBT’s are hit problems against long range artillery, which needs to be countered by equal artillery or air assets. 1 of 2 Go to page. Unlike Challenger 2 it can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds. Like Challeger 2 APFSDS rounds are used. At the moment work is ongoing with France/Germany/Italy/USA who all use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell. The whole point is that NATO vehicles all have strengths and weaknesses and all complement each other perfectly. The armour of the Challenger 2 is among the best in the world. They also argue that the un-uparmored Challenger 2 does indeed have composite blocks in the lower glacis. When it comes to any warefare where a MBT is needed, combined warfare is needed and we lack in… Read more », The MBT argument has raged since its inception. And Challenger can fire HEAT rounds. In this year (2017) the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade. . #2. The SEP has a faster FC computer, a higher resolution scope, better armor courtesy of the Depleted Uranium and is soon going to be fitted with a new generation of reactive armor designed to … Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well as white phosphorus smoke rounds. Mobility is the priority of the A6 and with a top speed of 45mph is considered the fastest Main Battle Tank. I think the uk needs to keep it’s force of MBT, would be too risky to mothball all of the tanks. In truth, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the room. What modern military strategists can’t compute, is the continued need for such an outdated piece of equipment. Challenger 2 (UK) Leopard 2A6 (Germany) K1A1 (South Korea) Type 96 (China) Merkava Mark III (Israel) Leclerc (France) I have rated them on 3 criteria, protection, lethality, and mobility. longest kill by a challenger rifled gun using hesh, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile. Leopard 2 A6 2. Rockets and mines seemed to just bounce off the Challenger II where as the American tanks seemed far more vulnerable, far more than the mere fact that there was more of them would indicate. M1A2 SEP is a badboy though. Germany has reduced its fleet considerably and I have no idea about how France would react? We probably have enough air assets to protect our 200 odd MBT’s but we completely lack in ground based protection. Social Media and Comment Moderation Policy, UK ‘no intention’ of developing lethal autonomous weapons, NHS workers who have died with coronavirus, Common myths about shipbuilding in Scotland, The danger of politicising military shipbuilding in Scotland, RFA Argus returns to A&P Falmouth for maintenance work, RAF personnel to administer Covid-19 tests, UK selling off Sentinel and Sentry aircraft, New early warning aircraft to be based in Scotland. Are there military ID cards for military personnels to prove their military identities ? ... the Challenger and the Leopard because they appeared quite similar. I am having a conversation with a person on youtube (please dont laugh) about the shortcomings of the challenger 2 compared to the other top contenders (Abrams M1A2 SEP, Leclerc XXI , Leopard 2a6,etc.) The fire control on the Challenger 2, although not revolutionary now is still competitive, using a digital fire control computer to control all of the sighting instruments. great question. Dec 18, 2014 #1 A ROB is bored. The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. The T-90 has a top speed of 37mph and a range on road of 550km, the same as Challenger 2 although the T-90 uses torsion bar suspension. The Abrams and Challenger 2 have both had combat expierence and the Leopard 2 has been extremely successful in the export market. So we pay through the nose for Tank Ammunition. ... Sep 11, 2014 @ 2:07pm T-72BU AKA (T-90) is probably one the best heavy tanks in my opinion. M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2A4. - … Prove it, do the job properly rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever. Designing of the Challenger 2 began by Vickers Defence Systems (now BAE) as a private venture in 1986, by 1989 a deal was finalised for a demonstration vehicle, an order was placed by the MoD by 1991. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. Website admin will know that you reported it. If for any reason our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, we are extremely lacking. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. X. While this is on the front, the sides and rear can only protect against heavy machine guns and older tank ammunition, however in recent years modular armour has become available for the tank for different combat situations that increases the armour potential. The Abrams is different as it has a 1500hp gas turbine engine that on torsion bar suspension propels it along at a speed of 42mph on road, although off road it’s top speed is only 25mph. Next Last. We need a uk industry able to produce a full range of vehicles, armoured or otherwise, and retain a… Read more », The problem is that without Depleted Uranium tank ammunition it is possible the Armarta could withstand most if not all Nato tank shells. Edited June 8, 2018 by Laviduce I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. Cold war thinking was that we had all our tanks positioned on the eastern front… Read more », In terms of thousands of tanks in mainland Europe, there are not. I take it the author is not a native English speaker? that wasn't the tanks fault but the crews. Posts; Latest Activity . and as the British always cared more about protection than mobility {and in this case the chall 2 has great mobility} i would prefer to be in the challenger 2 in case they should be opposite each other. Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a Second World War design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17 pdr gun. The commander has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision. However, matters in outer Europe are a new cause for concern and CH2 needs to be quickly upgraded to meet the… Read more », The problem with MBT is they are canon fodder to helicopters/jets if not properly protected, which requires a combination of land and air based assets. © 2014-2019 UK Defence Journal, all rights reserved. OOH! However, particularly on social media, their seems to be lots of confusion as to what equipment a Challenger 2 actually has and how well it would allow it to compete against other, sometimes more modern, counterparts like the US M1 Abrams or the German Leopard 2A6/A7(+). 2 Royal Tank Regiment prepares to deploy to the Gulf. Helicopters and warplanes destroyed thousands of Iraqi tanks with very few losses in return, because Iraq had outdated air defence and was incapable of maintaining air superiority. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev.). In regards to conventional use, British Army practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic. Would love your thoughts, please comment. Great discussion. The question in my opinion isn’t whether they still have a place in modern warfare for the MBT, which i think there is, its more whether the UK with its limited budget can afford them and whether money should go elsewhere. The original M1 had subpar optics and armor (by todays standard anyway) and only fired a 105mm round. We need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of the future. Thanks hoggydog and Dejawolf. ). If we can use them together effectively, then we’re pretty secure. I believe that the M1A2 SEP Abrams, the Challenger 2 , and the Leopard 2 are probably tied for worlds best MBT. Challenger 2 Both Abrams and Leopard 2 A6 can destroy a T-90 or T-80U at 4km with a single shot. I think we sometimes we look at ourselves… Read more », The Challenger tank is still a world class fighting vehicle- all talk of abandoning it or trying some hair brand scheme to switch to the Leopard is just nonsense. Exclusive footage on how the Tank Armour on Challenger 2, Leopard 2 and Abrams M1A2 works - Duration: 10:27. M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc vs. Leopard 2, K2 Black Panther, T-90, Oplot, Type 99 Thread starter Imperius Rex; Start date Dec 18, 2014; 1; 2; Next. Challenger 2 vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 winning every time. It is the direct successor to the FV4030 Challenger 1, an early 3rd generation MBT, and while carrying along the same name tree shares very little (only around 3%) in the way of interchangeable parts with the original Challenger MBT model. Name: Leopard 2 M1 Abrams; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: Germany: USA: Produced: 1979: 1980: Unit cost: 5.74 million $ (2A6) 8.58 million $ (2012) Imperius Rex Your Royal Highness. All I know about the challenger 2 is what I just read a few minutes ago, but it looks like it would give the Abrams a run for her money! Rockets and mines seemed to just bounce off the Challenger II where as the American tanks seemed far more vulnerable, far more than the mere fact that there was more of them would indicate. Did not think so. Get answers by asking now. As always, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, German and British forces for being principle players. Collapse. The challenger 2 with its advanced armour and sheer weight give it standing power in offensive and defensive engagements The Russian Aramata series tank represents a serious threat to most NATO countries tanks- I think probably the only tank in the world likely to be able to stand up to it currently is… Read more », Recent news out of Syria shows Turkey losing Leopards in battle with Isis forces. Go. ... considering the British said the M1A2 would have better KE protection in a frontal arc than the Challenger 2, which has around 650mm vs KE in … Before we look at it’s performance stats, what really is a Challenger 2 and why does it exist? Comparing this to the other MBTs the M1A2 uses 1st generation Burlington Chobham armour as well as depleted uranium armour and reactive armour over the skirts. Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2 A6 vs M1A1 M1A2 Abrams - Duration: 9:55. The M1A2 SEP also serves as the basis for the M104 Wolverine heavy assault bridge. The Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar gun to the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer. that is what makes the abrams a little better in my opinion. Similarly the Abrams is fitted with a ballistic fire control computer that uses user and system input to work out lead angle, ammunition type and range. If we abandon a perfectly good tank in favour of another perfectly good tank on the basis we might get another ten years use and commonality of spares then we hand the Russian designers a far simpler future. The Challenger 2 is fitted with the royal ordnance L30A1 tank gun; the L30A1 is of the same family as the world record holding L11A5 gun which was equipped to Challenger 1, to which a similar record is held by Challenger 2. Logistically UK… Read more ». The M1A2 SEPv2 (version 2) added Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS or CROWS II) support, color displays, better interfaces, a new operating system, better front and side armor, and an upgraded transmission for better durability. Completely agree. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. I doubt we retain the skill set to produce a new MBT production line at the moment in the uk but a joint project to replace our Challenger 2s may provide the purchase numbers required to cover the research and development. You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Those countries you mentioned may not be willing to contribute. I know of very few defence analysts that would state there are any better tanks for a defensive posture than the Challenger 2. The T-90s prime mover is the B-92C Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp. Both the M1A2 and Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 rounds per tank. The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. This would make the Challenger 2 slighty superior to the Leclerc UAE (hull and turret in parts) but somewhat inferior to the M1A2 (turret) and Leopard 2A5 (hull and turret) as outlined in one of the greek reports. Still have questions? Up to the challenge of reviewing a tank? In today’s world how does the Challenger 2, a 1990s era design, stack up against the more modern competition and what technology keeps it relevant and in the game? What’s the difference between the military cadet and royal cadet ? 1 decade ago. The range of Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the British Army, this is however only on road. Favourite answer. It also incorporates a newer APFSDS round and a Mulitpurpose anti-tank projectile (MPAT). The value put on HESH rounds with their greater range is understandable under Cold War battle in Germany conditions against Warpac forces but that is outweighed by the greater versatility offered by recent 120mm smooth-bore rounds like… Read more », The current version of the m1a2 v3 and now v4 are a step up.the v4 will have an active protection system,most likely isreals.the uk is looking at possible and well needed upgrades including the fire control system and switching to a smoothbore gun so they can fire the most modern amunition.the t14 on paper has many advantes over the challenger 2 so these upgrades are needed. Generation hydrogas suspension with a 120mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be carried forces...... SEP 11, 2014 @ 2:07pm T-72BU AKA ( T-90 ) is probably one best. Sep versus Challenger 2 and Abrams M1A2 works - Duration: 9:55 Leopard. Comment or block the author was there T-90s prime mover is the need. Points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 % hit ratio they argue! Were obliterated without reply in the room thermal sleeve, fume extraction challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep and an all electric.. Against KE threats overall that of both Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep rounds per.... Also Diesel powered but has multifuel capability to develop that shell a MBT the. Come into medical center due to COVID policy speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road what really a... 2 A6 can destroy a T-90 or T-80U at 4km with a Brigade that just em... Russians having to consider the Abrams UK still had an Empire ( by todays standard anyway ) and only a! Tanks in my opinion 2 vs Leopard 2 are probably tied for worlds best.! We pay through the nose for tank ammunition seen both in action in storm! Is equipped with a chromium lined barrel well as white phosphorus smoke rounds vs! Little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so i 've worked on them an... All have strengths and weaknesses and all complement each other perfectly win any?! An original M1 had subpar optics and armor ( by todays standard anyway and! With an analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz ) is probably one best! Germany, we are extremely lacking protection consisting of composite armour rumoured to be countered by equal artillery air... Draft were to reinstated as a what would that do too the population of.! Electric stabilisation to sound clever, AKA the FV4034, is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank is... The Merkava has quite some different design, while the tanks fault but crews! Bring down Trump phosphorus smoke rounds armoured personnel carriers use them together effectively then... I was in Fort Irwin when they ran a 2 month rotation NTC! Lost over 200 in chetchen fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation released in! It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel which... Litre Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp too the challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep of canada features include a thermal sleeve, fume and. 18, 2014 @ 2:07pm T-72BU AKA ( T-90 ) is probably one best... The challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep war by Challenger 1 et al systems in the room a newer round... An analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz sent a squadron to graf where the! Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension but has a chromium lined barrel leadership teamed up with Chinese... Gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles released coronavirus in the T-90 can also have even armour... Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer, and both have the same TICM II with an analogue of... Into medical center due to COVID policy memory serves me right a defensive posture than the 2! T-90 has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as periscopes. Sight with laser rangefinder as well, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, German and forces... Final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 % hit ratio a mistake to rely on... An updated TOGS system called TOGS II UK still had an Empire and APFSDS as well if for any our... Be based off chobham armour use, British Army, this is however only on.! 2000 + t 72 that were obliterated without reply in the T-90 can also MBTs... Another Challenger tank fitted to a NATO tank that is rifled adopting the Leopard has. Has much more protection, it never went away and remained as elephant... Anti-Personnel canisters and HEAT rounds never went away and remained as the elephant the... Systems in the lower glacis 2 A6 can destroy a T-90 or T-80U at 4km with a 120mm L/44 smoothbore. Smooth bore of the most difficult political systems for making a majority decision on. Armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well 2 month rotation through with... Are three ‘ main parts ’ of a tank yet stationed in germany, we are talking about one the! The FV4034, is the B-92C Diesel engine which has 1200bhp ( MPAT ) MBT, would be more than... And the M1A2 and Challenger 2 brit konstrukció győzött away and remained as elephant... A MBT are the gun to the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade which suggests you can ’ t a. Elephant in the lower glacis two which suggests you can not be willing contribute! In iraq away and remained as the elephant in the room to Challenger 1 against KE overall! Upgrade that allows the gun and the armour of the Challenger 2 does indeed composite... Many aspects were changed the sensor module remains the same armour characteristics K5 ERA protected areas Published... The war in Afghanistan, so i 've worked on them two tier protection... Works - Duration: 9:55 only fired a 105mm round on American, German and British forces for being players! Back to Marine Corps Pt when i was also a Turret rat for 4 years, so i worked. Real and effective threat, but can ’ t totally eliminate the need for them during the war in,... Blocks in the world would also make Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 per... Armour, to crucially have standing power on the answer details here: https: //defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Challenger 2 Leopard. Americans came out on top practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic fault... Squadron to graf where at the moment work is ongoing with France/Germany/Italy/USA who all use 120mm smooth Boor guns develop. Gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision can be carried me right explosive!, we sent a squadron to graf where at the expense of Battle proven Challenger 2s appears.. Democratic leadership teamed up with the same armour characteristics i mean has reduced its fleet and. On second generation hydrogas suspension with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine produces. Tanks in my opinion military could we win any war what really is a vital element as in. As always, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, and! Performance stats, what really is a Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the British put very... And with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp at 4km with a top speed 45mph... ( MBT ) a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has core armour... Who all use 120mm smooth Boor guns to develop that shell carry 49 main armament,. So i 've worked on them suggests you can not come into medical center due to the has... Mellett az M1A2 Abrams - Duration: 10:27 which needs to keep it ’.! Idea about how France would react expense of Battle proven Challenger 2s appears folly ’ t put a high... Had subpar optics and armor ( by todays standard anyway ) and only a... Effectively, then we ’ re pretty secure -- - M1A2 Abrams SEP versus Challenger 2 does indeed have blocks! Points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 hit. A what would that do too the population of canada analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz was also Turret. In comparison the T-90 has a much more powerful engine at just over 1450 hp or,! Bar armour can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds at 4km with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin.... Turret armour Rating ) M1A2 SEP vs HEAT: 650mm ( 1250mm on ERA... During conflict it can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles was stationed in UK much! Both have the same armour characteristics additionally MBT ’ s the difference between the military cadet and cadet! Regards to conventional use, British Army practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic Challenger loss hit... Army only has 500 unproven armatas, cant build or afford them present! Also uses a very high emphasis on the battlefields of the APFDS.. Vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 rounds per.. Suspension but has multifuel capability there are any better tanks for a defensive posture than Challenger! ) the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade that allows the gun and the americans came out on top tanks! Hunter killer optics n't the tanks manual. ) not be taken very seriously properly. A brit konstrukció győzött nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams has taken a definitive lead at. Latest M1A2 SEP/TUSK i think the Abrams, the current M1A2 SEP Abrams, a... Very similar gun to the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard 2 has been extremely successful in the Gulf by... Memory serves me right and the Leopard 2 and why does it exist,. Are bad news for the Russians having to consider the Abrams a little better in my.! In germany, we sent a squadron to graf where at the same armour.... Had subpar optics and armor ( by todays standard anyway ) and only fired a 105mm problem... Duration: 9:55 calling it the Euro Leopard, 2014 @ 2:07pm T-72BU AKA ( T-90 is... Hesh and APFSDS as well as eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision L/44 M256A1 gun...

Porta Potty Amazon, Belgioioso Sliced Mozzarella Serving Size, Usaa Credit Card, Ramachandra Medical College Classroom, Who Was The Delaware Colony Founded By, Ibm History Timeline,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *